LFS doesn't need to deny it's own self
shelton at onr.com
Sun Aug 1 11:10:49 PDT 2004
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> uname -a
> on my LFS system, I get
> ...... GenuineIntel unknown GNU/Linux
> Wouldn't it be much nice if it showed LFS 5.1 here?
this is the hardware-platform field of the output.
the same as uname -i
> Does anybody know where to patch this and to apply such a patch
> per default?
there is a new patch coreutils-5.2.1-uname-2.patch
i just applied this patch and followed the LFS-5.1 instructions
but instead of doing everything else i think i'll just
install the new uname to the correct location.
[rick at loco /usr/src/LFS-5.1/coreutils-5.2.1]$ uname -a
Linux loco 2.4.26-20040702 #1 Fri Jul 2 16:09:55 MDT 2004 i686 GenuineIntel
[rick at loco /usr/src/LFS-5.1/coreutils-5.2.1]$ uname -i
[/usr/src/LFS-5.1/coreutils-5.2.1]$ ./src/uname -a
Linux loco 2.4.26-20040702 #1 Fri Jul 2 16:09:55 MDT 2004 i686 pentium3 i386
[/usr/src/LFS-5.1/coreutils-5.2.1]$ ./src/uname -i
More information about the lfs-support