glibc check gives errors.

darkshadow darkshadow at shaw.ca
Mon Apr 26 10:30:59 PDT 2004


Jochen Schroeder wrote:

> darkshadow wrote:
>
>> darkshadow wrote:
>>
>>> Joel Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>> IIRC, you get these test errors if your host's 2.6 kernel was 
>>>> compiled with gcc 2.x. I don't know if it safe to continue or not. 
>>>> You'll have to find some one more knowledgeable than me to answer 
>>>> that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info. I may end up wasting time but I came up with a 
>>> idea
>>>
>>> tarball up what I have as a backup just incase later someone gives 
>>> me a better choice then just continue then as soon as possible 
>>> (after book done but before extra programs get installed) recompile 
>>> glibc using the kernel I compiled for the new system
>>>
>>> Someone tell me if this will work please
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ok I am slightly annoyed during the next package (binutils) I also 
>> got errors. So I am not just going to go on.
>>
>> Since I know that I can't upgrade my hosts gcc to 3.4.0 since it 
>> requires newer glibc which if I upgrade I will break stuff.
>> What version of gcc can I safely move to with my current setup of 
>> glibc version 2.2.5 and gcc version 2.95.3
>>
>> Then I will recompile my kernel and at least get rid of the nptl 
>> errors when I compile glibc and hopefully the errors will disappear 
>> from binutils if I am using a good compile of glibc
>
> Maybe try asking on lfs-hackers, because that's where most of the 
> be-lfs development happened, I don't know if all of these people are 
> monitoring lfs-support.
>
> Cheers
> Jochen

Ok I will try that



More information about the lfs-support mailing list