REPOST: Advanced (quickest) LFS?

vincent blondel vincent.blondel at chello.be
Tue Apr 13 10:59:15 PDT 2004


I don't think it currently exists, maybe just because this will become the 
main branch as soon as the LFS project mill migrate to kernel 2.6.x. but I 
will also put some other packages on my site for some advance features as 
security enhancements, ...

On Monday 12 April 2004 21:07, EC wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hope it's not too much out of topic.
>
> Is there a nALFS profile for BELFS ?
>
> EC.
>
> >-----Message d'origine-----
> >De : lfs-support-bounces at linuxfromscratch.org [mailto:lfs-support-
> >bounces at linuxfromscratch.org] De la part de vincent blondel
> >Envoyé : mercredi 7 avril 2004 22:43
> >À : LFS Support List; Saad Malik
> >Objet : Re: REPOST: Advanced (quickest) LFS?
> >
> >Saad,
> >
> >You have to know that there well exist some new devel branches of LFS
> >including the new linux kernel family 2.6.x and the complete new libraries
> >NTPL ( replacement of linuxthreads  with linux 2.4.x ).
> >
> >You can well compile a new system regarding the instructions you can find
> >on
> >this site http://belfs.linux-phreak.net/.
> >
> >Now, if you want to download a ready to run system, I put on my ftp server
> >ftp://jlang.dyndns.org:3021/pub/lfs/iso a build for i686 systems. This iso
> >file is not bootable but you just have to modify manually configuration
> >files.
> >
> >Regards
> >Vincent
> >
> >On Wednesday 07 April 2004 17:33, Saad Malik wrote:
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >> I had built my 5.0 LFS and 5.0 BLFS system about 6 months ago without
> >> any problems.
> >>
> >> It was very educational, and productive...
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I screwed up my Glibc last week. What happened was that
> >> I was trying to upgrade Glibc to match my 2.6.4 Kernel header files.
> >> The libraries compiled fine, but gave some odd error during install
> >> phase. Anyway, suffice it to say, 'ls' wouldn't even work.. gave a
> >> segementation fault error.
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried everything to repair my glibc (used Slackware 9.1 to mount lfs
> >> partition and somehow reinstall glibc with no optimization flags). But
> >> that just created more problems.
> >>
> >> I formatted my partition, and now I'm back at the beginning of the LFS
> >> book. Instead of doing the same routine of building temporary system,
> >> then installing the main system over it...
> >> I was wondering if someone knew of a guide or could give some pointers
> >> on the fastest way to build a *working* LFS system independent of the
> >> host (slackware).
> >>
> >> I would want dynamic libraries instead of static calls built into the
> >> system.
> >>
> >> So in summary 2 questions:
> >> 1. Fastest way of building a *working* LFS system independent of host.
> >> Is there a way I could perhaps skip the /tools making, and somehow
> >> start directly installing the packages in /usr && /bin? (would be
> >> using 2.6.5 kernel).
> >>
> >> 2. Knowing that I will screw up my glibc in the future. How am I able
> >> to repair my glibc files in the future? Is there anyway? I just want
> >> to know if it is possible, perhaps someday I'll be able to help a lost
> >> puppy like me ;)
> >>
> >> Thanks Very Much.
> >> Saad a.k.a SimFox3
> >
> >--
> >http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> >FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> >Unsubscribe: See the above information page




More information about the lfs-support mailing list