LFS 5.0 is a serious problem

DJ Lucas dj at lucasit.com
Sun Nov 16 18:18:54 PST 2003

^(o,o)^ Turk2000 wrote:


>  IMO the old methods are quick: 18 vs 26 steps.

I felt compelled to step in here and say that you are correct, except 
that you forget about 49 additional (and in some cases 98 IIRC Greg's 
iteriation analysis) packages to be built when doing chapter 6 a second 
time (and in some cases a third) to acheive the clenliness of the base 
system that we have now.


>  Turk

-- DJ

More information about the lfs-support mailing list