LFS 5.0 is a serious problem
cheeziologist at mail.isc.rit.edu
Sat Nov 15 11:38:33 PST 2003
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:04:47 -0500, Billy O'Connor
<billyoc at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> Joel Miller <cheeziologist at mail.isc.rit.edu> writes:
>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:58:37 +0100, <acnrvi at tin.it> wrote:
>> > but i will follow LFS 4.0 it's most easy than LFS 5.0 with his
>> > insane patches
>> > for each packages. Thank you!
>> Quite frankly, that will not work. Even if it does work, the packages
>> you make will most likely be flawed in some manner. Stick to the book
> Is there some reason the 4.0 book doesn't work anymore?
No, the 4.0 book works fine if you use 4.0 packages. I took his comment to
mean that he was using 5.0 stuff with the 4.0 instructions. Perhaps I
misinterpreted. Sorry for any confusion.
Registered LFS User 6929
Registered Linux User 298182
More information about the lfs-support