bug report to lkml
Alexander E. Patrakov
semzx at newmail.ru
Thu Jan 30 20:01:12 PST 2003
On Friday 31 January 2003 03:11, Rui Ferreira wrote:
> Short answer:
> It's my fault;
> I'm the only one to blame for my own problem.
Wrong if the significant difference in .configs does not boil down to the
support of some buggy chipset.
> Long answer:
> I've tried your #3 option (linux-2.4.21-pre4 with gcc-2.95.3) with
> no success either.
> As sugested by Ian Molton, I copied mandrake's kernel tree (the
> working one) over to my lfs system and compiled it with gcc-2.95.3 and with
> mandrake's .config file (yes, the one for i586, with everything on it and a
> assload of modules) == Success !
Even a badly configured kernrel should not make oops'es. Try to boil the
problem down to a minimal difference in .config, then recompile wigh gcc
3.2.1 and see if this makes sence.
Since the problem really exists, people on lkml should be notified.
Alexander E. Patrakov.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support