matthias at winterdrache.de
Tue Jan 21 10:04:57 PST 2003
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:38:08 +0100 "Alexander Riedel"
<Riedel.Alexander at gmx.de> wrote:
> why isn't devfs used in LFS ?
> I think devfs is stable enough to use it.
You may think so but that doesn't make it true. There are HEAPS of bugs
found and fixed in it all the time, and some people would even like to
replace it with something different. I suggest you read at least kernel
traffic (http://kt.zork.net/) before judging the stability of kernel
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support