spyro at f2s.com
Tue Jan 14 12:02:23 PST 2003
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:07:06 +0000 (UTC)
jschrod at uni-muenster.de (Jochen Schröder) wrote:
> Ian, either I don't understand your reasoning or you have misread
> Dagmar's posting. If lmsensors was supposed to get the headers from
> /usr/src/linux/include[linux|asm] and /usr/src/linux/ is not a
> symlink to /usr/src/linux-x.x.xx how was it supposed to compile for
> 2.4.21-pre2? Please explain.
Its supposed to get them DIRECTLY from /usr/src/linux NOT
/usr/include/[linux|asm] which is glibcs PRIVATE copy.
re-read what I wrote. I'll quote it here for you...
> Then these packages are broken and should either not be silly and
> depend on the kernel, OR they are kernel modules, which should use
> /usr/src/linux/include/[linux|asm] and NOT /usr/include/[linux|asm]
> last time I compiles lmsensors, it seemed to be of the mistaken
> impression it should use /usr/include/[linux|asm]. this resulted in it
> compiling for 2.4.20 when I was running 2.4.21-pre2.
lmsensors should have looked in /usr/src/linux for the headers of the
KERNEL I am running, because it is compiling KERNEL MODULES.
user space applications linking with glibc should use glibcs own
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support