I made it! (gcc 3.2 successful compiled)
kaiyilin at compuserve.de
Mon Oct 28 06:47:37 PST 2002
Right. Then u mean that the removed 64M SIMM contains some errors?
But I used mem86 to check it. After 10tests everything was OK.
Dagmar d'Surreal wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, kaiyi lin wrote:
>>Finally after around i hours of compiling I made it. I said in last post
>>that I assumed that I had CPU overheat problem and cannot make gcc 3.2
>>compile in Chapter5. Now I found out that it was the RAM problem. More
>>precisely I had not enough RAM(only 64M and Swap 100MB) 'Cause I DID
>>increased my RAM to 256MB yesterday and compiled gcc 3.2 in Chapter5
>>successfully.(How come?? 64MB not enough for compiling gcc?? Strange)
> 64M is more than enough to compile GCC. You might run into some problems
> if you're running X and a browser at the time, but if you're just running
> something really lightweight like Blackbox and a few xterms, you should be
> fine for compiling anything you want.
> If you just bumped your RAM up to 256Mb from 64, and you aren't doing it
> with 4 64Mb 72-pin SIMMs, then you probably aren't having the problem
> because you took the 64Mb of RAM you had before completely out of the
> machine and replaced it with a couple of 128Mb DIMMs, right?
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support