Removing Source Tree in Ch 5
Seth W. Klein
sk at sethwklein.net
Tue Mar 19 21:45:20 PST 2002
Gerard Beekmans <gerard at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:27:35PM -0500, Seth W. Klein wrote:
> > <snip about including "cd .. && rm -rf <build tree>">
> Secondly I see this just as a desperate attempt to cut down on traffic.
I don't see it as an attempt to cut down on traffic at all. If it
comes up once a week, that's probably three or four messages a week.
Not a big deal.
Theoretically, i suppose cutting down on traffic is the FAQ
maintainer's job. I prefer to think of my job as making the lives
of people, especially those new to the project/subject, as easy
as practical. If people are failing to understand the book, and
that's causing them problems, then i try to find a way to fix it.
> Instead of forcefully rm -rf'ing the source tree I rather try rewrite the
> book a bit to point out these things more clearly.
As i understand it, we've kinda tried that. However, if you think
we can do better, i'm willing. If you get an update made to the
book, i'll rewrite that faq entry.
> But, as always I will give it some thought. I'm not going to make a rash
> decision right now.
It would be good to do something kinda promptly, though. It's an
ongoing problem people are having.
Seth W. Klein
sk at sethwklein.net http://www.sethwklein.net/
Maintainer, LFS FAQ http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Life on the edge? You're taking too much space
if you're not living hanging from your safty harness rope.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support