Glibc-2.2.5 compile error in chapter 6 of LFS 3.2
Bill Maltby LFS Related
lfsbill at wlmlx1.wlmcs.com
Sun Mar 10 18:38:48 PST 2002
Gerard and Folks,
I've been following and finally figured maybe what you're seeing is
somewhat related to what I've seen. Consistently inconsistent fails
in the glibc install process.
In my case, I believe I've worked around it, but maybe some of my
conditions apply in the questions you've been fielding.
My BILLS semi-automated stuff is all bash. I am developing on two
low-resource machines. A 200MHz 64MB Pentuim-MMX, RH 6.2 and a
166 MHz AMD 32MB, RH 6.0.
Now the deal was that I was going for max performance, damn the
memory usage. I was suitably punished for my transgressions.
Symptoms included random failures to install in glibc (the most
persistent and sever case), gcc, e2fsprogs, ncurses. The mode
of failure was not consistent. Sometimes syntax errors in C code,
sometimes C compiler failure with signal 11, sometimes C syntax
errors in different places.
After eliminating the possibility of hardware error by pure
dint of faith, I began to suspect that my wanton use of scarce
resources was somehow related, even though this is not a Micro-
soft piece of... work. So I began "unoptimizing" some of my code
a little bit at a time and managed to eliminate all the failures
Hmm... said I. I had noticed that glibc with all i18n stuff all
being done was a world-class hog. To clean that one up, I had
to absolutely inline all the code, effectively having only one
level deep nesting.
Where I think this _might_ relate is this. Are the folks having
problems on limited resource machines? Are they running from
script? Are their machines in states 3 or 5? I have found that
all these things combined and individually seem to expose some
kind of weakness somewhere in the Linux/bash/make when it comes
to managing memory.
Various levels of progress can be made by running single-user
or typing all commands manually (no bash scripts) for the heavy-
hitters or, as I had to do, simplifying to some level all the
Since my stuff was scripted and no changes were made to my chapter
5 scripts in achieving success, I know that the static compiles
were done correctly. But glibc still failed until I reduced memory
Now just tonight, gcc failed on the 32MB 166MHz RH 6.0 with a
signal 11 in chapter 6. And glibc tried to enter an infinite loop.
But armed with my new-found knowledge, I shut down X, nfs, inetd and
any other non-essentials and glibc finished. I am now rerunning gcc
and expect success.
I don't know if any of this is related, but the stuff I've seen
in the articles was beginning to look awfully familiar.
billm at wlmcs.com
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support