Compile LFS for i386? Problem with Cyrix
Steve.Isaacs at itron.com
Tue Mar 5 16:47:32 PST 2002
Chris Lingard wrote:
>arthur at linuxbox.nu wrote:
>>Okay, let me rephrase that. I never touch the march or mcpu flags. I
>>always simply do the uname hack and everything works itself out so the
>>system works on any Intel platform 386 and above.
>I am glad that you said that. This is what I do, though I do set CFLAGS to
>get rid of debugging symbols.
Ok, I'm intrigued. Could someone describe the "uname hack" so that I can
attempt the same thing? I apparently have been doing things the hard way
trying to ferret out how to force 386 on each package -- one - by - one
-- which has been a general pain.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support