LFS and PAM
matthias at winterdrache.de
Fri Oct 26 15:09:28 PDT 2001
On 26 Oct 2001, at 11:06, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> PS: IMHO pam should be part of LFS per default, any chance it will be added
> to a future version?
Has been discussed several times already and the outcome is always the
same: Many people never need it, so PAM is BLFS stuff (join the blfs-*
mailing list(s) to influence how BLFS deals with PAM). The only issue is
that some packages part of base LFS need to be compiled after PAM, so
future versions of the book should/will probably have notes about this.
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-support