has glibc info changed?

Matthias Benkmann matthias at winterdrache.de
Tue Oct 16 09:21:06 PDT 2001

On 16 Oct 2001, at 19:28, Erika Pacholleck wrote:

> [15.10.01 00:28 +0200] Matthias Benkmann <-- :
> > My old LFS 2.4 does not have entries for C library functions in the top-
> > level dir but my LFS 3.0 seems to have them. Is this normal? In other
> > words:
> > 
> > Does `info fork'
> > 
> > return an info page or a manpage on an LFS 3.0 system?
> > It returns a manpage on my LFS 2.4 but an info page on LFS 3.0. I just
> > want to make sure this is related to changes in glibc and not some
> > screwup during my build process.
> Not sure what you meant with LFS 2.4, so just give you the ones I have:

LFS 2.4 is the 2.4 release of the book which still uses glibc 2.1.3. Is 
there no one out there who still has such a system?


The real art of conversation
is not only to say the right thing at the right time,
but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-support mailing list