LFS Paper on Secure Servers

Ricardo Barberis ricardo at dattatec.com
Mon May 10 12:20:09 PDT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

El Lunes 03 Mayo 2004 05:50, Bostjan Skufca (at) domenca.si escribió:
> Hello,

< snip >
> Filesystem:
> I (personally of course) prefer reiserfs (v3) to ext3 as it feels more
> robust and I (personally and at a company) never had problems with it.

One problem with reiserfs is that it doesn't have quota support in v3. 
That's why we still use ext3 in our servers (hosting).
But I agree with you about its performance and robustness.

Oh well, we'll have to wait for v4 ;)

Cheers.
- -- 
Ricardo Barberis
SysAdmin - Datacenter
Dattatec.com
Hosting Solutions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAn9XqnabpmElFaJkRAk9uAJ0Z0TGzGasha/1LxjIc+zhbC6IBZwCfdMEc
pDt1Bt7V8ktc/ZMoiA6otLY=
=nMoI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the lfs-security mailing list