[OT] Re: no more buffer overflows

Daniel Roethlisberger daniel at roe.ch
Mon May 5 15:21:43 PDT 2003


Archaic <archaic at indy.rr.com> wrote:
> I'm starting to think there are few subscribed to this list judging by
> the nearly non-existant discussion.

This is getting increasingly off-topic, but I think many "use" this list
primarily as a means to be informed about important LFS-relevant
security announcements without having to follow lfs-discuss et al, which
tends to be overly time-consuming.

cheers,
dan


-- 
   Daniel Roethlisberger <daniel at roe.ch>
   OpenPGP key id 0x804A06B1 (1024/4096 DSA/ElGamal)
   144D 6A5E 0C88 E5D7 0775 FCFD 3974 0E98 804A 06B1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-security/attachments/20030506/b9985beb/attachment.sig>


More information about the lfs-security mailing list