LFS 6.0 hardcopy
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Feb 14 16:25:29 PST 2005
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 02/14/05 18:01 CST:
> On February 14, 2005 05:13 pm, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
>>"psfaddtable A link to psfxtable"
>>is not very useful ;-)
> True, but is psfxtable explained properly? That's how things are usually done.
> Saves space by not duplicating the same descriptions.
However, when the symlink provides different *default* functionality
than the actual binary, shouldn't the *default* use by explained?
It would be better than just saying it's a symlink. At least what
I get from the two separate man pages shows a difference in
rmlinux: [GNU ld version 184.108.40.206.2 20040727] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.1]
[GNU C Library 2004-07-01 release version 2.3.4] [Linux 220.127.116.11 i686]
18:23:00 up 9 days, 2:12, 8 users, load average: 0.01, 0.03, 0.05
More information about the lfs-chat