Borland Kylix on (B)LFS 6.0
rincewindwizard at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 9 09:01:31 PST 2005
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Rincewind wrote:
>> Anyway, I assume from your question (and from the fact that my
>> attempts to do so failed) that it's impossible to compile gcc-2.95 on
> gcc-2.95 builds and works fine on LFS 6.0. What you are having a problem
> with is not the compiler, but binaries built by the compiler.
Yes, your previous post was very clear: the fact that gcc-2.95 won't
compile is an unrelated problem. It appears in this thread simply
because Randy mentioned it and I wanted a confirmation that I am not the
only one that has the same problem.
> The major distros solve this problem by providing _both_ versions of
> glibc. LFS does not do that.
If I wanted to try this, would it be terribly complicated or simply
More information about the lfs-chat