Fwd: Re: thoughts on kernel security issues
jason at tommyk.com
Sat Feb 5 23:29:57 PST 2005
On 05-Feb-05 20:11, ken_i_m at elegantinnovations.net wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from Alan Cox <alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> -----
> [...] In truth no 2.6 released kernel is suitable for
> anything but beta testing until you add a few patches anyway.
Even ignoring the security thingy, given the number of egregious bugs
I've seen wibbling around the web and unstable-branch alike changes to
core functionality, I'd tend to agree with that sentiment.
That said, as far as LFS goes, it's assumed that the user knows what
there doing so... hmmm.
More information about the lfs-chat