C++ problem -

Björn Lindberg d95-bli at nada.kth.se
Thu Aug 26 04:15:02 PDT 2004

michael <michael8110 at terra.com.br> writes:

<big snip>

> but upon introducing the function getmax() ,nothing works anymore.This
> function is part of a more complex reorder function .What really is
> odd is  that the programs are identical except as to how they fetch
> their  input.(Incidentally, if i run the complete programs,the read
> from file  produces a huge list of the same big numberover and over
> and way down,the  correct output !).I'm aware that few things can be
> as boring as reading  someone else's code (listening to their
> dreams,perhaps ) but i'll be very  thankful for any ideas.--

The only reason reading your code is boring to read is because it is
horribly formatted. It is quite frankly impossible to read in this
state. If you repost your code with better indentation and formatting,
I'll be happy to help. But I don't want to take the trouble going
through it all reindenting and formatting it myself just to see what
is going on.

Meanwhile, here are a couple of notes:


You write:

>    michael ~ # g++ input_from_user.cpp
> input_from_user.cpp:61:2: warning: no newline at end of file

That is a warning from your compiler. Listen to it! Especially when
learning, but also later, you should always use the compilation flags
"-Wall -ansi -pedantic". Strive to silence the compiler, and take all
warnings seriously.


Unless you are implementing your own linked list as part of the
learning process, use std::list instead, and use as much of the
standard library algorithms as possible. This will make your code
shorter, simpler, clearer & most importantly less buggy. For example I
see in your code many `new's but no `delete's, indicating to me that
as it is you have memory leaks in your program.


Even if you are implementing your own list as part of learning, I
would recommend you to look at std::list and mimic its semantics. Use
references and return by copy to minimize the number of pointers in
the code. Try to contain pointers within classes. As it is, your code
looks very C-ish.

Oh, and use std::string instead of character arrays.


More information about the lfs-chat mailing list