Why Compile Twice? Eliminate "Static"?
ruifmferreira at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 2 08:12:20 PDT 2002
The support list needs a FAQ 'email' answering machine :)
>From: Timothy Bauscher <timothy at linuxfromscratch.org>
>Reply-To: lfs-support at linuxfromscratch.org
>To: lfs-support at linuxfromscratch.org
>Subject: Re: Why Compile Twice? Eliminate "Static"?
>Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 07:20:20 -0700
>On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:53:45AM -0400, Casey Bralla wrote:
> > I'm working through the 3.3 LFS, and I notece that many of the packages
> > created in Chapter 5 are duplicated in Chapter 6. Is this so we
> > re-compile them without using the "static" option?
>There's an entire page about this in the book. Chapter 5:
>"Why do we use static linking?"
>To everyone: Please look through the book and the FAQ
>*before* asking your question on *-support. Thanks.
>-*- "Share and Enjoy" || "Go stick your head in a pig" -*-
>Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
>and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message
Converse com seus amigos online, faça o download grátis do MSN Messenger:
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-chat' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-chat