HLFS project scope.

Petersen Liman rabbit8888 at gmail.com
Wed May 26 00:40:27 PDT 2010

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:18 PM, robert baker <robertmbaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Below you will find my suggestions for the scope of the HLFS book.
> What we want to provide.
> - A base platform and build environment
> - A platform for building hardened servers, routers, and firewalls
> Work needed to reach a release candidate
> - various package version bumps
> - frandom update
> - glibc-sanitize-env
> - grub2
> - fortify source by default
> - test suite/sanity checks
> - x86_64 and i?86 build completion
> - multi-lib or pure64 or both
> - if pure64 is included patches or additional seds are needed
> - ssh daemon for bootable_temporary
> - libcap-ng (requires python)
> - completed book text
> In my oppinion HLFS-1.0 should be limited in scope to just the basic
> toolchain. Very few packages should be added beyond the scope of LFS.
> Those packages include libcap, (if we use libcap-ng we need Python
> too.) paxctl, and an ssh daemon for the bootable temporary tools. All
> other work should be focused on preparing the build environment and
> base install.
> HLFS-2.0 should be a more aggressive target. I would like to see the
> book include documentation on grsec's RBAC system. I would also like
> to see a full audit of posix capabilities on the binaries included in
> the base system. Some documentation on posix capabilities would also
> be a nice addition. Any additional packages that we agree should be in
> the book should be added for the 2.0 version.
> Any thoughts/comments/additions are welcome.
> RBaker
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Can there be a SSH alternative like telnet, RSH (Remote Sell), or
serial cable for people that want the terminal to be fast?

More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list