Readjusted linker issues etc.
robertmbaker at gmail.com
Wed May 20 15:16:59 PDT 2009
Very nice. Looks like a small amendmant to the binutils_pass2 is in
order. I will take a look at my build either tonight or tomorrow
depending on whether or not I can pry myself away from work.
As I stated earlier I am trying to spend some time focusing on the
test suite failures I am seeing. I am pretty satisfied with the
relatively low number of failures on binutils, but gcc is a whole
other story. GCC had hundreds of failures on the C and C++ tests.
Granted there are tens of thousands of tests, but that still seems
Can anyone else speak to the number of GCC test failures they see on
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Kevin Day <thekevinday at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM, robert baker <robertmbaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> As I mentioned the other day I did go ahead and build the temp system
>> again. This time I used linux-126.96.36.199 along with the corresponding
>> grsec patch. I have had no issues I can trace back to the kernel
>> includes. So at least early on that looks good.
>> I was experiencing problems with the re-adjusted linker before I
>> rebuilt the temporary system, but didn't look at it much because I was
>> trying to document the reboot procedure. These same issues did crop
>> back up on my latest rebuild. Taking a look at the ld-new that we
>> copy into /tools/bin during binutils-pass2 I found it was considerably
>> smaller than expected. Reading the file with a text editor shed some
>> light on my problems.
>> # ld-new - temporary wrapper script for .libs/ld-new
>> # Generated by ltmain.sh (GNU libtool 1.2435 2007/03/18 18:44:42) 2.1a
>> # The ld-new program cannot be directly executed until all the libtool
>> # libraries that it depends on are installed.
>> # This wrapper script should never be moved out of the build directory.
>> # If it is, it will not operate correctly.
>> Going back to my binutils obj/ directory and executing the below
>> commad installed a working re-adjusted linker.
>> make -C ld install
>> Robert Baker
> This has happened to me on seemingly random occasions (though I very
> much doubt its random).
> The problem seems to be related to how they create a wrapper script to
> call their binary that they hide inside of their source code
> They "hide" the actual binary in ld/.libs/ld-new (the libs has a
> period before it).
> I could never understand why they would want to hide a binary in such a way..
> I've added the following command to my scripts to handle the case
> should it happen:
> if [ -e ld/.libs/ld-new ] ; then cp -v ld/.libs/ld-new bin/ ; else cp
> -v ld/ld-new /bin/ ; fi
> Kevin Day
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
More information about the hlfs-dev