why the chroot phase of uclibc weren't patched like the previous toolchain?
narutocanada at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 04:28:15 PST 2007
On 11/16/07, naruto canada <narutocanada at gmail.com> wrote:
> why the chroot phase of uclibc weren't patched like the previous toolchain?
> was it because too many packages wouldn't build? or maybe it has
> already those features?
My fault, I was thinking about the gcc patches, uclibc weren't patched as much.
Gee, that must have been a traumatic experience to see 7 patches in one go.
More information about the hlfs-dev