robert at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon May 28 20:24:22 PDT 2007
On Thursday May 24 2007 10:19:31 pm George Boudreau wrote:
> Now I remember why I gave up assembler for 'C'. But I have a stripped
> down version of your dd that compiles with
> gcc -c dd.s
> ld -o dd dd.o
> strip dd give 884 bytes.
Cool, thanks. Btw, does nasm generally make smaller programs? The nasm
version, with the extra options, is only about 7 bytes larger.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the hlfs-dev