Robert Connolly robert at
Mon May 28 20:24:22 PDT 2007

On Thursday May 24 2007 10:19:31 pm George Boudreau wrote:
> Now I remember why I gave up assembler for 'C'. But I have a stripped
> down version of your dd that compiles with
>    gcc -c dd.s
>    ld -o dd dd.o
>    strip dd give 884 bytes.

Cool, thanks. Btw, does nasm generally make smaller programs? The nasm 
version, with the extra options, is only about 7 bytes larger.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list