Install Vim to /bin?

Robert Connolly robert at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Feb 10 00:10:14 PST 2007


I copied vim, symlinked vi to it, in a chroot with just bash and libraries, 
and both vim and vi work... they can create and edit plain text files, 
without any warnings or messages that anything is missing. The /usr/share/vim 
directory is over 20 megs.. much of it is locales, and spell files. It's too 
much to install to /etc/vim. We can't really expect locales to work properly 
without /usr anyway.

robert

On Friday 09 February 2007 21:52, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 02/09/07 20:48 CST:
> > Robert Connolly wrote these words on 02/09/07 14:17 CST:
> >> If we had Ed it might be a different story, but I think Vim should be
> >> installed to /bin so it is available in single-user mode, etcetera .
> >
> > Agreed, wholeheartedly.
>
> I forgot to mention that there are some support dirs (/usr/share/vim)
> to think about. Not sure if it is needed to run the base editor.
>
> --
> Randy
>
> rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
> [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
> 20:51:00 up 30 days, 21:05, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.11, 0.04
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/hlfs-dev/attachments/20070210/1c0618cc/attachment.sig>


More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list