HLFS 64bit again

Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. rogelio at smsglobal.net
Tue Dec 4 23:17:51 PST 2007

Jaap Struyk wrote:
> After spending almost a month trying to build a secure 64bit system I
> begin to wonder why, will it be more secure than a 32bit system?
> (will it be less vulrable to buffer overflows due to the larger buffers???)
It cannot be more secure. 64 bit machines has capabilities that some
people need and its good to have a secure platform for them. I am
working with in memory databases and 64 bit machines are ideal for this.

Democracy is about two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for dinner.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rogelio.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 333 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/hlfs-dev/attachments/20071205/1046dc38/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/hlfs-dev/attachments/20071205/1046dc38/attachment.sig>

More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list