Status of HLFS

Peter Ennis peterennis at
Thu Sep 28 10:37:32 PDT 2006

Sebastian wrote:

>I have already developed a pretty stable HLFS (ie. I have not found
>a bug yet...).

>Have a look at

I looked at this when you announced it
(more than a year already?) and that
track record certainly bears a "Stable"
status IMHO.

I am also inclined toward the 
2.6.whatever-is-most-stable as a base
considering that gcc 4.1 etc. is
the next stable target.



More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list