best uclibc snapshot
thekevinday at gmail.com
Wed Sep 6 10:48:22 PDT 2006
On 9/5/06, Dermot Bradley <bradley at tangram.nildram.co.uk> wrote:
> > I have been looking into segfault/memory leak problems and having been
> > thinking it was uClibc:
> > http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2006-August/016100.html
> > Which means that some did exist and are fixed. So trying versions
> > after that may be safer. The 20060817 snapshot was released sometime
> > after that post, and uClibc is currently boasting the 20060819
> > snapshot, so it should not contain the memory leak.
> That email list posting seems to be about a bug in uClibc++, not uClibc.
Thanks for catching that, I must have overlooked the ++.
More information about the hlfs-dev