gcc 4.1 hath fallen
gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu Dec 7 19:03:39 PST 2006
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:48:51 -0600, Kevin Day wrote:
> in addition to numerous problems the hlfs project (as well as my own
> rigs) has faced, whenever the HLFS dev picks back up, gcc-4.1 should
> be avoided.
Did you read the entire thread leading up to that patch? Or even look
at the patch itself? It's specifically the Suse gcc-4.1.0 that's busted.
gcc-4.1.1 is fine. I'm amazed at some of the stuff I read on this list..
More information about the hlfs-dev