binutils-2.16

Robert Connolly robert at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat May 7 23:16:24 PDT 2005


FSF binutils-2.16 looks like its alright, at least for x86. I assume we can 
switch to this? The patches are no problem, the uclibc one is already made, 
the pt_pax one only has 1 rejected hunk, and its a comment :) I'm not 
positive but I don't think this version of binutils depends on m4, bison, and 
flex, in chapter 5.

robert



More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list