upcomming 0.2 release
archaic at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Jan 8 07:26:46 PST 2005
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:22:33AM -0500, Robert Connolly wrote:
> uClibc still has its advantages. You can install just want you need
> with uClibc, where as with Glibc you need to install everything.
> uClibc was made to be small while supporting almost everything. This
> causes both advantages and disadvantages.
But we should seriously considering weighing the goals of writing a book
with the goals of producing super customized, highly individualized
> As always the thing that worries me the most is the Linux kernel. We
> can't have an uptime of more than a month or two before more
> vulnerabilities are found. And the 2.6 maintainers keep adding new
> features to a stable branch.
I figured as much. However, most of these "new" vulns are applicable to
the 2.4 kernel as well, so I guess it is good that people are more
actively bug hunting the kernel. Uptime means nothing to me. Reboots are
a part of good admin practices when it comes to kernel security.
> Until then I would like to add as much as we can.. selinux patches,
> blowfish passwords, etc, optionally of course.
At some point we have to solidify what the base will be so we can start
actually making the system useful, i.e. server applications.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within
limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others."
- Thomas Jefferson
More information about the hlfs-dev