uclibc and tar-1.14

Robert Connolly robert at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Nov 17 18:37:17 PST 2004

Not that I know of. I'm not sure what to do with this. I asked about it on the 
uclibc mailing list, the only reply I got was from someone saying they have 
the same problem. Tar-1.13.92 is the last tar that works, .94 got the new 
code. I'm still pretty sure this is a problem with bzip2, the new tar is 
likely behaving properly and its bzip2 that is being weird. I'm going to use 
1.13.92 for now, later I'll try to experiment with 3rd party bzip2's, like 
from busybox and netbsd.


On November 14, 2004 10:05 pm, Bennett Todd wrote:
> tar 1.13.25 seems to work fine. Any urgent incentive to update?
> -Bennett

More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list