uclibc vs glibc

Robert Connolly robert at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Nov 6 14:02:05 PST 2004

On November 6, 2004 04:39 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Did you patch binutils, e.g. using
> buildroot/toolchain/binutils/ ?
Yes, I used binutils and gcc patches for the uclibc cvs toolchain, using their 
binutils and gcc versions.

> > and a more serious problem is /usr/include is still being checked for
> > headers. Anyone know what determines the default include directory? is it
> > gcc (that wouldn't make sence here)? gawk and coreutils for example are
> > going beyond $(prefix)/include and searching /usr/include.
> From memory, /usr/include _is_ the standard.  Maybe try -nostdinc with
> -I for where you want it to look ?

Does /usr/include get searched in a normal lfs build in chapter 5 (after 
adjusting toolchain) ?

More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list