uclibc vs glibc

Robert Connolly robert at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Nov 1 18:25:08 PST 2004


I really not too sure of the status on that. Apache should build, but I don't 
know about modules. I'm still trying to get a uclibc toolchain built (without 
their buildroot script).

On November 1, 2004 09:00 pm, Archaic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:24:39PM -0400, Robert Connolly wrote:
> <..>
>
> You are the one doing the heavy development work. As long as apache (and
> it's mods) and any other server we want to support run on uclibc, then
> we should be okay. I believe we both agree on X not being a priority. At
> least not in this situation. Will this help in the rebuildability
> problem you were discussing earlier?
>
> --
> Archaic
>
> The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
> hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless
> series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
>
> - H.L. Mencken



More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list