dagmar.wants at nospam.com
Wed Mar 10 05:51:02 PST 2004
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 23:22, Archaic wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 10:56:28PM -0600, Dagmar d'Surreal wrote:
> > People who have ssh shouldn't bother using ftp anymore. Scp more or
> > less deprecates it, and there's also an sftp service unrelated to a
> > "classic" ftpd (but which still works the same from a user's
> > perspective) that one can use that's part of OpenSSH.
> I don't buy that as a wholesale statement. Every single time I've ever
> used sftp or scp on a large file, the transfer time was hideous compared
> to straight ftp. If I need something to travel the pipes encrypted, then
> fine. Otherwise I'll stick to ftp (or more likely http since I don't
> have tons of stuff laying around for public consumption of my
You using 486SX's? I get ~5MB/s over scp here all the time.
The email address above is phony because my penis is already large enough, kthx.
AIM: evilDagmar Jabber: evilDagmar at jabber.org
More information about the hlfs-dev