spyro at f2s.com
Sun Mar 7 02:49:36 PST 2004
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 00:22:10 -0500
Archaic <archaic at indy.rr.com> wrote:
> I don't buy that as a wholesale statement. Every single time I've ever
> used sftp or scp on a large file, the transfer time was hideous
> compared to straight ftp. If I need something to travel the pipes
> encrypted, then fine. Otherwise I'll stick to ftp (or more likely http
> since I don't have tons of stuff laying around for public consumption
> of my bandwidth).
Theres no requirement to have the data encrypted. however the
authentication in these packages is FAR better.
you can even run your ssh session in plaintext if you like use -c none
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
More information about the hlfs-dev