Blowfish support in crypt() (glibc) ?

Ian Molton spyro at f2s.com
Mon Jun 7 18:37:05 PDT 2004


On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:20:26 +1000
Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:

> Like all security you have to choose what you apply where to suit the
> individual requirements of your implementation depending on its
> exposure.

and, of course, this is HLFS...

the question is... which is best? new (unproven) code for a better hash,
or old proven code for a weaker but still very good hash?



More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list