coreutils su

Robert Connolly cendres at videotron.ca
Tue Jan 20 11:56:13 PST 2004


On January 20, 2004 01:26 pm, Archaic wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:53:05PM -0500, Robert Connolly wrote:
> > I think its important to look for ways of preventing any overwritting or
> > moving of objects after they're installed. Its easier to allow it to
> > build, and just prevent it from installing, than it is to keep it from
> > building at all.
>
> I agree with you in general, but how does that work with the assumption
> of a complete LFS? Or should we shift our assumption to a completed
> chapter 5 LFS only? I'll ask Ryan and Greg about their thoughts on the
> stability of chapter5 for building this target.

Having two packages install the same file is not good for accounting. Neither 
is moving them. It's unsanitary and gets flagged at an audit.




More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list