Ryan.Oliver at Ryan.Oliver at
Sun Jan 11 22:43:43 PST 2004

Robert Connolly wrote:
> RSBAC is easier to drop on an existing system, but its less secure
> then selinux, at least from what I gather so far.

That would depend I guess.

Personally I wonder how much havoc you could cause with the
multitude of open hooks into the kernel provided by the LSM...

RSBAC if I remember correctly doesnt use the LSM.


More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list