cendres at videotron.ca
Thu Jan 8 19:44:05 PST 2004
On January 8, 2004 08:23 pm, Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:
> > Sound like enough for a v0.1
> Probably more blfs enhancements than a true base-hlfs but we could
> also possibly squeeze in chrooting most all services for v0.1 .
> Archaic and I were working on some stuff a while back mainly for a
> chrooted proftpd build where users are also chrooted into their
> (inside chroot) home directory (see the buggers break out of two
> chroots :-) ), but methods could be reused for
> pretty much everything.
> For those that don't like adding users to the system that, say,
> only require ftp access we've got proftpd authenticating against
> a passwd/shadow file inside the chroot
> (handled by a modified shadow utils built against busyboxes libpwd.a).
> This could come in handy for other services too...
> Just some thoughts...
I just noticed blfs makes no mention that /var/empty/dev/log should exist for
sshd, and sysklogd should be listening to it with -a.
More information about the hlfs-dev