cendres at videotron.ca
Wed Jan 7 19:02:47 PST 2004
On January 7, 2004 07:33 pm, Zack Winkles wrote:
> As a side note, you guys trying to make the smallest version of
> true/false have already been beaten by the author of that document. The
> code he presents returns 42, granted, but any idiot can modify it.
> Can't beat 45 bytes with a stick.
Not nessesarily what's smallest, but a 450kb static binary for 1 short line of
code is unreasonable. Asm has advantages but its not easy to distribute. The
only thing else I can think of is an sh script, unless there's another app
that can return 1 and exit.
More information about the hlfs-dev