Ken Moffat ken at
Sun Jan 4 11:58:40 PST 2004

On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, ashes wrote:

> It looks like there are too many reasons not to use uclibc. Considering glibc
> doesn't have any outstanding bugs, and uclibc does, the trade offs wouldn't
> be worth it, at least right now.
 Responding late to this, I agree.  I _like_ uclibc, but it isn't yet at
a place where the maintainer considers it stable.

Kryten: This is a job for Riviera Kid!

More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list