ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net
Sun Jan 4 11:58:40 PST 2004
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, ashes wrote:
> It looks like there are too many reasons not to use uclibc. Considering glibc
> doesn't have any outstanding bugs, and uclibc does, the trade offs wouldn't
> be worth it, at least right now.
Responding late to this, I agree. I _like_ uclibc, but it isn't yet at
a place where the maintainer considers it stable.
Kryten: This is a job for Riviera Kid!
More information about the hlfs-dev