archaic at indy.rr.com
Sat Jan 3 08:35:43 PST 2004
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:29:22AM -0500, Robert Day wrote:
> This is where the long-term goal of a pre-built BootCd comes in handy -
> the boot Cd can include a patched gcc and glibc.
A bootCD would be nice, BUT, many people cannot afford to download one.
> In the mean time, would it make more sense to do this....
> Assume we are going to simple modify LFS....
> Building the /tools dir, we build glibc.... patch it here...
> we also build gcc here, and patch it.....
> Then after we chroot, we have a patched glibc and a patched, guarded
> gcc... NOW we build a new glibc that IS guarded. Sensible?
If LFS decides to point links to HLFS, then people most certainly could
shortcut buy patching in chapter 5. However, I think we need to assume a
complete LFS in the main instructions with notes that certain steps need
not be done if they were done by following the shortcut links in LFS
Love your country, but never trust its government.
- Robert A. Heinlein.
More information about the hlfs-dev