Suitability (of Java)

Don Smith dss-lfs at cfl.rr.com
Sat Apr 3 08:55:01 PST 2004


John Quinn wrote:

> Don may be surprised to see these results:
> http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=5602

The only surprise was that Java 1.4.2 was really slow at trig. Is anyone 
surprised that compilers written by MS produce the fastest code on an OS 
written by MS?




More information about the hlfs-dev mailing list