richard.melville69 at googlemail.com
Mon Nov 4 05:06:44 PST 2013
On 4 November 2013 07:00, <blfs-support-request at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> Send blfs-support mailing list submissions to
> Richard Melville wrote:
> > Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for
> > and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still useful as
> > more secure way of creating a user with no login shell?
> > Fish.com, together with the titan hardening package, seems to have
> > into a a tropical fish website, but the noshell source code is still
> > available from Debian.
> I'm unaware why noshell would be an advantage over /bin/false. What
> does it do that is needed?
> -- Bruce
AFAIK it provides better logging in the auth.log with an explicit *WARNING*
when a user with noshell tries to log in.
This is only heresay as I haven't used it; I was hoping for some advice.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the blfs-support