[blfs-support] browsers (was Re: Latest news in GNOME world)

Aleksandar Kuktin akuktin at gmail.com
Thu Nov 22 09:41:52 PST 2012


>On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:58:51 +1300
>Simon Geard <delgarde at ihug.co.nz> wrote:

> > If a site is going to only support a couple of browsers, I typically
> > don't feel their content is worth jumping through hoops to view and
> > I don't feel it's worth recommending to others.
> 
> Do you mean that they clearly block it from being used on IE? Or is it
> that it just doesn't work, and they make it clear they're not going to
> fix it? I have a lot of sympathy for the latter attitude - yes, it
> excludes some users, but if you're trying to do anything fancy,
> supporting IE ranges from difficult to outright impossible.

I had a similar problem, only done by different actors. When Apple had
their cloud thing, it had a habit of flat out refusing to serve a
browser running on Linux.

-- 
   Fourth law of programming:
   Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/attachments/20121122/fe3c6a87/attachment.sig>


More information about the blfs-support mailing list