[blfs-support] Latest news in GNOME world

Armin K. krejzi at email.com
Tue Nov 13 14:23:58 PST 2012


Dana 13.11.2012 23:09, lux-integ je napisao:
> On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:09:02 Ken Moffat wrote:
>>   I loathe cmake [ reinventing the bumpy wheel of configure, but with
>> edges instead of the fairly smooth curves, in my biased opinion ] so
>> I've long since given up on kde.
>
> what a shame .
>
> cmake is the future.
> It works will with c/c++, fortran less so ada) and even   java  is
> underdevelopment  (to replace ant !)
> (I can envisage a revamped Apache openoffice, postgresql,  openjdk   etc -all
> migrating soon to cmake )
>
>   cmake  is a bit tedius to translate some things from autoconf  (the configH
> porting can be  tedious)   ut  once done, tewaking and maintence is easy.  It
> gives   better control on libraries, executables and linking.   For instance I
> had problems linking with atlas9 libraries (fortran)  that chocked autconf
> but  was doable with cmake.    Thanfuly atlas10  has overcome these.
>
> Also QT- ( I consider a crown-jewel-of-the-gpl)-based  software  increasingly
> is dropping qmake  in favour of cmake.
>
>
> perhaps you should give cmake another whirl
>
> cheers
>
> luxInteg
>

One giant + that I give cmake over autotools is that cmake does not! 
need to produce or use the (very anoying) .la files.



More information about the blfs-support mailing list