[blfs-support] Latest news in GNOME world
krejzi at email.com
Tue Nov 13 14:23:58 PST 2012
Dana 13.11.2012 23:09, lux-integ je napisao:
> On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:09:02 Ken Moffat wrote:
>> I loathe cmake [ reinventing the bumpy wheel of configure, but with
>> edges instead of the fairly smooth curves, in my biased opinion ] so
>> I've long since given up on kde.
> what a shame .
> cmake is the future.
> It works will with c/c++, fortran less so ada) and even java is
> underdevelopment (to replace ant !)
> (I can envisage a revamped Apache openoffice, postgresql, openjdk etc -all
> migrating soon to cmake )
> cmake is a bit tedius to translate some things from autoconf (the configH
> porting can be tedious) ut once done, tewaking and maintence is easy. It
> gives better control on libraries, executables and linking. For instance I
> had problems linking with atlas9 libraries (fortran) that chocked autconf
> but was doable with cmake. Thanfuly atlas10 has overcome these.
> Also QT- ( I consider a crown-jewel-of-the-gpl)-based software increasingly
> is dropping qmake in favour of cmake.
> perhaps you should give cmake another whirl
One giant + that I give cmake over autotools is that cmake does not!
need to produce or use the (very anoying) .la files.
More information about the blfs-support