[blfs-support] upower : configuration ?
zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Sun Feb 26 10:04:04 PST 2012
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:27:56PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:14 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > or perhaps upower actually needs pm-utils at runtime, even on a
> > desktop ?
> I wouldn't rule it out. A desktop might not have a battery, but it's
> still eligible to be suspended/hibernated, no different to any laptop in
> that regard.
Tried it, managed to suspend but not to resume (fortunately I've
commented out the >/dev/null in the checkfs bootscript), but it
doesn't make any difference - gnome-power-stats still can't get
processor wakeups per second. Oh well.
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
More information about the blfs-support