[blfs-support] make shadow fails after installation of Linux-PAM

Andrew Benton b3nton at gmail.com
Sat Feb 4 05:54:13 PST 2012


On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:43:36 +0100
Ronnie van Aarle <ronnie.van.aarle at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I tried, and it seems my assuptions on the libdir= from
> libpam_misc.lawas right. I did the same thing again for
> libpam.la because libpam.so also was not found.
> 
> However, now I ran into a new problem, and I am not sure how to fix it. The
> issue now is:
> 
> $ ls -lag /usr/lib/libpam{,misc}.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 blfs 10 feb  3 13:24 /usr/lib/libpam_misc.so -> ../../lib/
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 blfs 10 feb  3 13:24 /usr/lib/libpam.so -> ../../lib/
> 
> It seems like both symlinks are pointing to the directory ../../lib.
> 
> I know some basics on bash, but its still puzzling for me and far from
> routine. I thought I might have done something wrong so I went on step
> back, unzipped Linux-PAM again and did these steps over:
> 
> $ make install
> $ chmod -v 4755 /lib/security/unix_chkpwd
> 
> I skipped the tests that had to do with *.la because these files are
> updated with the new path and allready in place.
> 
> $ mv -v /lib/security/pam_tally /sbin
> 
> $ if [ -L /lib/libpam.so ]; then
>    for LINK in libpam{,c,_misc}.so; do
>        ln -v -sf ../../lib/$(readlink /lib/${LINK}) /usr/lib/${LINK} &&
>        rm -v /lib/${LINK}
>    done
> fi
> 
> I do have my doubts on this last if-statement for-loop, because I don't
> realy think it does what it is supposed to do. In my situation, I am
> building shadow from
> 
> /sources/security/shadow-4.1.3/
> 
> So ../../lib does not exist. I suppose that I can just drop the ../../
> because I think the /lib/libpam{,c,_misc}.so are the files that are
> required. While I'm writing this email I just decided that that is also the
> next thing I want to try, however, I would realy appreciate some
> confirmation from someone who has more skills and routine in bash than I do.
> 
> I'm a bit afreight of deviating from the instructions from the book,
> because in the past, with earlier attempts of installing lfs, I also found
> issues that forced me to attempt solving things myself and I did end up
> with a broken or incomplete build, which is luckily not the case this time.
> 
> Besides that I'm also a bit paranoid on every package that has to do with
> security, because in the near future I want to make another lfs build that
> I want to use for website hosting, and I do need to be able to guarantee my
> future users a stable service.
> 
> This one is on a notebook, with which I want to develop and test the
> applications and configurations that I want to deploy on the next
> installation, a server for hosting them.
> 
> Any assistance is realy appreciated, because I have to rely on the quality
> and stability of the resulting builds in the future.
> 

I'm sorry for your troubles, unfortunately I'm a bit busy at the moment
and I won't be able to look at this for a day of two.

Andy



More information about the blfs-support mailing list